I think if this season has taught us something, it’s that
my first instincts are maybe not as far off as they may initially appear. Two
Summers ago when I developed the Similar Games (SG) systems, I was probably as
bullish as I’ve ever been about a set of systems. In private and on the blog, I
made my feelings perfectly clear that I thought these 3 systems could
potentially be the best systems I’d ever seen from the backtested results.
Given that was after the first season where the results of a number of systems
were unbelievable, I think some people thought my comments were a little bit
mad!
Two seasons ago, I dived straight into the SG systems
with full stakes (I’m pretty conservative when following unproven systems but
not with these) and to say it was disappointing was an understatement. I can’t
quite recall how much I staked in £ terms (was a helluva lot!) but I basically quit
in March that season when I was break-even. The systems then went on a decent
little run towards the end of the season and actually managed a small profit
over the season but to say I was underwhelmed was an understatement.
Last Summer, I thought long and hard about these 3
systems and I actually thought about dropping them completely form the TFA
portfolio of systems as clearly, they didn’t look very good. However, when
doing the system reviews last Summer, I realised the results weren’t all that
bad as the systems struggled a lot with draws and if a few more results had
gone their way, it would have been a much better season.
Anyway, I decided that I should have more in my first
instincts and this season, these 3 systems were
a large part of my betting portfolio. I would go as far to say that I
overstaked these bets which is never a bright thing to do but I just had a deep
belief that the systems couldn’t do any worse than the first season. If I stand back now and compare that to the
Euro systems (which to be honest, I didn’t trust last season at all and never
got comfortable with them even people were telling they were fine and had a
decent edge!) and even the Under/Over systems (which I have never trusted from
day one), then clearly, my first instincts aren’t too far off.
A lesson for myself here I think and a lesson for those
that listen to my advice from my postings on the blog.
These 3 systems only make up 50% of the results on the
Misc systems. The other 3 systems are solid enough systems but they aren’t
great I think. Thought that after the first season and to be honest, think the
same after this season. However, they are still better than most of the other
footie systems on the market. We’re just spoilt here with the fact TFA has so
many good systems to follow!
Season 2012/13
Performance
These systems were the most consistent systems over the
season. They started the season well, didn’t have any major midseason blips and
finished the season pretty well (although I felt like they were hanging on a
little towards the end but I think it wasn’t too bad).
I think we need to look at the performance of the Misc
systems in two parts. We have the systems 6-32, 21-31 and 6-21-32 which are
simply made up of combinations of Est Systems and New Systems. We then have
TOX, STOY and STOZ which are a little bit different although the ratings for
the Est Systems and New Systems underpin the bets but the bets have an added
dimension to them in the sense they are based on historical trends too. Hence, this added flavour clearly didn’t do
much to the SG bets in season one but boy, has it made a difference last
season.
System 21-31 led the way from the first 3 systems with an
ROI of 7.9% from 469 bets. As I said above, if this was a normal footie system
in the marketplace, it would be a highly respectable system I think. Maybe in the top 10% of football
systems? Doesn’t even make the top 10
TFA systems!
The other two systems didn’t have bad seasons either. A
6.1% return for 6-32 from 243 bets and a 6.1% return from 449 bets for system
6-21-31.
If we look at the 3 SG systems, we’ll see a slightly
different picture. STOZ led the way with
an ROI of 21.6% from 336 bets. That’s a profit of 72.7pts this season. TOX wasn’t
too far behind and had an ROI of 20.6% from 306 bets. The lowest performing
system was STOY which ‘only’ achieved an ROI of 16.2% from 307 bets.
Overall, the SG systems in total achieved an ROI of 19.5%
across 949 bets. A profit of 185.5pts in total across 3 systems. A stunning
return and goes along way to showing why I had such a good season myself.
If we look at the 6 Misc systems in total, it’s a profit
of 264.9pts from 2,110 bets last season. A much better performance than the
first season!
All Live Results
Interestingly, given the fact the SG systems had a poor
first season, when you look at the results over the last two seasons, there isn’t
such a big gap between the first 3 systems and the 3 SG systems as we saw this
season. However, the SG systems now start to look very special I think and
given the performance last season, they have a great deal of potential I
suspect going forward.
STOZ leads the way with a 13.9% ROI across 608 bets. TOX
isn’t far behind with an ROI of 12.8% 585 bets and STOY has an ROI of 10.3%
from 588 bets.
The other 3 systems don’t look too bad themselves with
ROIs ranging from 4.7% to 8.5%. As I
say, these 3 systems aren’t bad at all but compared to the 3 SG systems, they
look fairly ordinary I think.
The power of the SG systems can be seen from the ROC figures
from last season. STOZ led the way with an unbelievable ROC of 181.7%. This is
actually the best ROC any of my systems has ever managed in a season and
therefore, this puts this system pretty high up the pecking order I suspect of
systems in the marketplace. In any other season, TOX would surely be taking all
the plaudits going with an ROC of 140.4% and likewise, STOY isn’t too shabby
either with an ROC of 103.5%.
21-31 and 6-21-31 managed ROC’s of 63.8% and 54.9%
respectively and the only slight disappointment is system 6-32 with an ROC of
29.9%.
Overall, some stunning returns from these systems over
the first two seasons and I think they enter their 3rd season next
season in a much better place than they entered last season! Of course, with
that comes added pressure and I can’t imagine I’ll be the only one keen on
these systems again next season but hopefully they can produce a similar level
of return.
Targets for 2013/14 Season
Going into last season, the actual targets for these
systems weren’t that high and they absolutely smashed the targets out the park,
so I don’t want to go mad with the targets next season as it would be
unrealistic to expect the systems to achieve the same returns again.
Before I discuss the targets, I should point out that even
after that amazing season, I’m increasing the betting banks for the SG systems.
They look a little light after seeing one of the drawdowns last season (which admittedly,
all happened in two weeks and was then
recovered in one week) but even so, I think we should adjust the betting banks
as a result of the drawdown. An extra 5pts has been added to the bank for TOX
and STOY and 2pts for STOY.
As you would expect, the 3 SG systems have the highest
ROI and ROC targets next season. STOZ leads the way with an ROC target of 80%.
TOX and STOY have 66% and 60% as targets and 21-31 and 6-21-31 both have a 54%
target. The only system that doesn’t look worth following is system 6-32 which has
an ROC target of only 18%. The system doesn’t have enough turnover
unfortunately and doesn’t achieve a high enough ROI for it to be of interest
for most of us going forward.
Detailed Analysis (All live results e.g.
last two seasons)
Performance by
Season
I doubt you’ll see this sort of improvement often from a
set of systems than you’ve seen this season with the SG systems. The 3 systems
achieved an ROI of circa. 4% last season and now have achieved a near 20% ROI
this season. 5 times as high and a massive improvement.
Last season, the systems achieved a similar level of
return for outright betting as for betting with AH0.5 but this season, outright
returns were much, much better. Again, it points to the systems maybe being a
little unlucky last season with draws.
Interestingly, system 6-32 actually had a better season this
season than last season even though it is the worst performing system in the
group. The other two systems 21-31 and 6-21-31 did better in the first season
but they at least now have two very similar seasons and in a way, that gives me
confidence in the systems. Although the SG systems have been brilliant this
season, maybe they carry more risk after what happened the first season and
maybe the other two are safer options as at least they have two good seasons
behind them and look fairly solid.
Looking at the Misc systems in total, I would say last
season maybe wasn’t twice as good as the first season although the outright
returns indicate this. As you look along the row of returns, the draw coverage
ate away at the profit margin last season whereas the first season, covering
draws wasn’t a bad idea at all given the number of draws.
Performance by
League
It’s quite scary to think that even with these returns,
two of the six leagues are losing money! League Two and the SPL are both
showing quite poor losses and it obviously means the returns in the other
leagues are amazing! We really need to wait to see what areas are causing the
losses as I would guess it’s SPL Homes and League Two Aways based on what I’ve
seen on other systems.
Performance by
League and Season
In the first season, League Two created a substantial
loss of 15% if backing outright (AH0.5 was profitable) but all the other
leagues were profitable.
Last season, the SPL created a substantial loss of 30%
but importantly, League Two was much better than the first season. Based on the
first season, you might have dropped League Two but it would have cost you
money last season I’m afraid.
Performance by
Home and Away
I remember discussing the performance of the Homes after
I built the SG systems, I remember discussing the performance of Homes during
the first season when the systems didn’t do well. Well, if you look at the performance of the
Homes on the SG systems now, it is truly stunning. Admittedly, the sample sizes
are very small and I wouldn’t like to be betting my life on this trend going
forward but so far, the Homes on the SG systems are the best Homes I’ve ever
seen on a football system.
STOZ leads the way with an ROI of 24.3%. The other two SG
systems have an ROI of 22.4% and 18.9%. Given the average odds on these systems
is 2.45, 2.22 and 2.25, to see ROI’s of 20% is nearly impossible to believe. I’ve
seen it done by Away bets before where you need to play at big odds to achieve
ROI’s of 20%+ but to see it on Home bets is incredible.
Interestingly, the Home bets on the other 3 systems
really struggle if I’m honest. None of the systems can beat a 5% ROI for Home
bets.
The Aways are much better on the other 3 systems and are
actually in line with the Aways on the SG systems.
I think what I’m getting at here is that you don’t need
to follow the Homes and Aways on any system. If you want to, you can split any
system into Homes and Aways and maybe you take the Homes from one system and the
Aways from another and create some form of Super System for you to follow. Admittedly, you don’t want to be just
cherrypicking the bets from the systems as you are in danger of backfitting
something that you’ll never manage to achieve live I suspect but when there are
clear trends (the Homes on the SG systems are the best homes from all my
systems I think), then you really need to play on it and maximise your profits
to the max.
Performance by
Home and Away by League
Some really clear trends here and with two seasons behind
these, maybe it’s worth considering varying your stakes or varying the bets a
little to try to maximise profits.
League Two Aways are terrible if following outright but
if using AH0.5, you can probably minimise your risk exposure based on the first
two season’s performance.
The SPL Homes are simply terrible and are probably the
worst subset of data I’ve seen reviewing the systems this Summer. An ROI of
-45.7% is crazy and although the sample size is small, we’ve seen similar
issues on the other systems. The SPL looks a tricky league full stop. Is it
worth the hassle of trying to find an edge in this league when the results look
so variable at times?
Obviously, there are lots of pockets of bets where the
returns are amazing and maybe it’s a case of trying to increase stakes on these
and minimise stakes on the bets which appear to struggle to find an edge or at
least, keep an eye on the trends early next season and maybe adjust your stakes
accordingly if you feel the trends are continuing.
No comments:
Post a Comment